Research
I use research to understand users, clarify problems, and give teams better evidence for product decisions.
My research spans discovery, usability, concept validation, surveys, analytics, and broader product questions, depending on what the team needs to learn.
Research Highlights
  • Decision-focused: Use research to clarify problems, reduce risk, and guide direction.
  • Integrated, not isolated: Embed research into product, design, and cross-functional decision-making.
  • Signal over volume: Focus on the most useful insight, not the most data.
  • Grounded in action: Translate findings into frameworks, priorities, and next steps teams can use.
How I Research

I use research throughout the process, from understanding the problem early on to testing ideas and informing product decisions.

Clarify

Define what the team needs to learn and what decisions the work should support.

  • Identify key questions and assumptions
  • Focus research on decisions, not curiosity alone
Learn

Select methods that match the problem, constraints, and level of uncertainty.

  • Use the right method for the decision at hand
  • Balance speed, rigor, and context
Synthesize

Turn raw inputs into patterns teams can understand and act on.

  • Distill findings into themes, tensions, and implications
  • Separate core signals from edge cases
Apply

Translate research into direction that shapes product, design, and tradeoffs.

  • Inform priorities, structure, and validation
  • Ensure findings influence outcomes, not just artifacts
What My Research Work Includes

My research work spans both discovery and validation, depending on the decision at hand.

  • Discovery research:
 User interviews, stakeholder interviews, contextual inquiry, and domain research to understand needs, constraints, and workflows
  • Problem framing and synthesis: Affinity mapping, insight synthesis, problem statements, and opportunity definition
  • Concept and structure validation: Concept testing, usability testing, tree testing, and workflow validation
  • Mixed-methods research: Combining qualitative insight with surveys, usage data, analytics, and experimentation
  • Ongoing evaluation: Iterative testing and analytics review to validate assumptions and guide refinement over time

I choose methods based on the decision at hand, not the process checklist.

Research in Service of Design and Leadership

Research matters when it changes what the team does. I use findings to shape flows, information architecture, interaction models, priorities, and sometimes the problem definition itself.

At its best, research becomes a shared reference point that grounds discussions across product, design, engineering, and marketing, ensuring findings influence outcomes, not just artifacts.

When Research Makes the Biggest Impact

I am most effective when research is used to:

  • Clarify ambiguous or poorly defined problem spaces
  • Align multiple disciplines around a shared understanding
  • Inform early structural and strategic decisions
  • Reduce risk in complex or high-stakes initiatives
  • Support decisions that must scale and hold up over time

In these environments, research helps the team make a better-informed call and keep moving.

Colleague feedback
“Derek helped establish a UX design culture corporate-wide by leading by example and rapidly prototyping concepts that clarified direction and informed decisions.”
L. Miguel Encarnação

Award-winning Technology & Innovation Leader
Case Studies
These case studies show how research informed problem framing, design decisions, and leadership tradeoffs under real constraints.
Let’s Connect
The easiest way to reach me is on LinkedIn. For more detailed inquiries, you can also use the contact form.